Clothing and Fashion
Many commentators have argued that clothes will alter society’s social, class, and women’s positions. Rouse (1989) indicates that clothes and design don’t represent gender identity values already developed. Nevertheless, some commentators say that style and clothes obey rigid simple concepts about males and females. This article aims at discussing the numerous theories that critics have formed about style and personality and to figure out how Rouses’ concept of clothing can be used for the cycle between typical and inverted styles. He would also find that this guy has abandoned his gender orientation by not conforming to a person’s sexual clothes.
Fashion was proposed to consist of three elements: the concept of noticeable waste, the concept of noticeable leisure, and the principle of up to date where waste is not applied to human activity (Veblen 1992). (Veblen 1992). This theory promoted the Marxist perception that only when culture becomes so well-organized that it creates more than the necessary to be able to live becomes trendy in the form of clothes.
(Braudel 1981) can be seen in his own way to support the Roses theory, which shows us what modesty we are able to hide, as fashion began with the noblest people, squires, and bourgeoisie. The explanation can be seen as a display of masculinity that therefore establishes an ignorant connexion between this dress and its position as a human being and as a governing class of society. (Wilson 1985) indicates that a shift of design started in the 14th century when the Royal Court ruled before the 18th century.
The theory of women ‘s style in the 19th century shows that citizens do not use active labor reinforces the belief that style serves to establish an identity and is part of the cycle. This can be seen by the fact that the women worn hats, long dresses, which hindered and reduced their independence, thereby reinforcing the perception that they depend on men and their place in society.
This appears that fashion stresses individuality, and it makes the community feel insecure as clothes are worn to build gender-bending ideologies. He often found unrealistic appearance expectations to be weak, and often insulting. Christina Aguilera at Edinburgh 2003 Music Awards (see Annex 1) is my first reference. Her clothes for this event do not represent traditional femininity ideals, and the magazine blamed her for that. Her first costume is a ripped tie-dyed top that looks delicious since it is a dress that represents her gender identity. The next outfit becomes very strong in absolute comparison. This is a dress and a little lace top with leather pants. She styles her hair as if doing it simply as opposed to the last dress.
But the journalist insulted her by claiming that she has lost her top and implies that what she wears is not appropriate to society because it does not convey her attractiveness. In this manner, she creates an offensive masculine image. The following outfit gives her a strange image. We think that it’s a woman who is on the block, but the outfit is somewhat incompatible with tradition and leaves the audience somewhat awkward in attempting to formulate what persona she needs to convey. Wilson’s definition of unrealistic appearance expectations may be viewed as this. Her face has changed absolutely again in her next costume. She’s in jeans that give a powerful face that is toned down by the light hue. And the top demonstrates femininity through the way that it has a ribbon, a very feminine concept, or a female name.
The next outfit uses, though, the same color as the previous shirt such the femininity is emphasized. It is coupled with a pair of pants that create a very manly picture. It’s somewhat awkward because she doesn’t represent certain sex in her clothes or the audience. For their next costume, a gothic picture appears to be created which the magazine takes away maybe because it does not represent the identification of women. It is contrary in comparison to the last outfit she wears to build and suit a woman’s personality, yet specifically, the last edition is once again a rather drastic one, and it’s called absurd by the publication.
This can 5656 be assumed then that this night’s clothes of Christina Aguilera build a certain sex identification, but the approval of her choices as fans to wear the clothes relies on whether the gender orientation actually occurs in a manner that is not too serious. This is also safe to claim that she tries to break from the distorted and oppressive philosophy of feminism. She is sporting jeans in a way to undo gender stereotypes.